ABSTRACT
Sedation of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) has lately become a concern. The purpose of this study was to report the sedation strategy used in COVID-19 ARDS patients who were mechanically ventilated at a single institution.
In this study, we performed a retrospective review of the sedation strategy in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients in our 37-bed intensive care unit. All mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients who were sedated and hospitalized between March 2020 and September 2021 were included in this study. Patients reported using sedatives and analgesics as well as suffering from delirium.
This study involved 100 patients with COVID-19 ARDS who were both eligible to participate. In all patients, a triple sedation regimen was required. Ketamine attitudes reduced patients’ opioid and benzodiazepine needs (p<0.05). Furthermore, the following ketamine administration, the need for vasopressors was significantly reduced (p<0.05). There were no drug interactions documented.
We showed that extremely high sedative doses were required in this group of patients with COVID-19 ARDS who needed MV. However, our findings suggest that when ketamine infusion was introduced, benzodiazepine, opiate, and vasopressor doses were reduced without adverse pharmacological effects. Further research will be required to determine appropriate dosing regimens.
Keywords: Ketamine, sedation, ARDS, COVID-19, mechanical ventilation
Introduction
Methods
Study Design and Setting
This is a single-center, retrospective observational study conducted in a 37-bed multidisciplinary academic intensive care unit (ICU) that serves between 900 and 950 inpatients each year. The study protocol was evaluated and approved by the University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital Ethics Committee (approval number: 2390, date: 29.05.2020). Our unit has a physician-driven institutional strategy, aiming for a sedation state of 2 to +1 on the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (9).
We used a first-line sedation approach comprising continuous infusion of an opioid (fentanyl, starting dosage 0.7 mcg/kg/h), a benzodiazepine (midazolam, starting dose 0.03 mg/kg/h), or a combination of both, depending on the clinical features of the patients and the projected illness course. When high opioid and benzodiazepine dosages (e.g., fentanyl 3 mcg/kg/h, midazolam 0.1 mg/kg/h) failed to provide appropriate analgosedation, ketamine was delivered as a continuous infusion at a dose of 10 mg/kg/min. Daily, bedside nurses employed the confusion assessment technique for ICU (CAM-ICU) to track the occurrence of delirium (10).
Study Population
We included all patients who had positive severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 polymerase chain reaction results and required invasive MV for ARDS between March 2020 and September 2021. Patients who were pregnant or breastfeeding, had psychosis as defined by the DSM-IV, were given a concomitant neuromuscular blocker, regularly used opiates, or were administered ketamine on the first day of MV were excluded from the study. Patients were treated for COVID-19 as per local guidelines.
Data Collection
A retrospective query of the institutional electronic system and medical documents was conducted to collect data for this study. The following variables were gathered: 1) demographic information such as age, gender, and weight; 2) clinical baseline features such as comorbidities, Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation II Score, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score; 3) ICU stay metrics such as MV duration, ICU length of stay, and 28-day mortality; 4) nature and dosages of concurrent continuous infusions of analgesics, sedatives, and vasopressor medications. 5) Any occurrence of withdrawal syndrome or delirium that occurred throughout the ICU stay (delirium in the ICU was recorded through the daily routine assessment of the CAM-ICU evaluation reports), 6) any adverse event (AE) that occurred during ketamine infusion.
Outcome Measures
In our study, ketamine was considered useful as an adjuvant for troublesome sedation if no changes in the doses of other analgesics and sedatives were necessary within 72 h following ketamine infusion. Finally, the safety profile of ketamine was assessed as a secondary goal, with a focus on hypertension, tachycardia, laryngospasm, hypersalivation, emesis, nystagmus, anaphylaxis, and erythema.
Statistical Analysis
There was no statistical power analysis performed before this retrospective investigation. The current investigation is looking back. The data was analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows version 26.0 software package (SPSS, Chicago, IL). The normality of the distribution was determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The quantitative data displayed are the mean ± standard deviation and median (interquartile range). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare hemodynamic parameters, sedative and analgesic use, and vasopressor usage before and after ketamine infusion. P<0.05 was found to be statistically significant.
Results
We identified 125 (of 830 patients who admitted to the unit and mechanically ventilated) mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria during the assessment period. Twenty patients were excluded; 13 of them were administered neuromuscular blockers, 5 patients received ketamine infusions for less than 24 h, and 2 patients had incomplete documentation. The 100 participants in the research were largely men with an average age of 67.1±14.4 years (Table 1).
Adjunctive analgesics and sedatives were reduced without the use of alternative sedatives. After ketamine administration, fentanyl use was significantly reduced at 24 h [4.25±1.56 vs. 2.71±1.56 µg/kg/hour, (p<0.001)], 48 h [4.25±1.56 vs. 1.50±1.62 µg/kg/hour, (p<0.001)] and 72 h [4.25±1.56 vs. 0.72±1.11 µg/kg/hour, (p<0.001)] (Table 2). Midazolam dose was similarly reduced at 24 h [0.21±0.71 vs. 0.14±0.59 mg/kg/hour, (p=0.007)], 48 h [0.21±0.71 vs. 0.10±0.47 mg/kg/hour, (p<0.001)], 72 h [0.21±0.71 vs. 0.09±0.58 mg/kg/hour, (p<0.001)] compared to baseline before ketamine (Table 2).
Table 2 shows the patient’s hemodynamic parameters. Heart rate and blood pressure did not considerably change during the experiment. Our study included 65 patients who required vasopressor treatment, 19 who continued to require vasopressors, and 46 who had vasopressors discontinued after 72 h. The norepinephrine dosage was substantially reduced after 24 hours of ketamine therapy [0.12±0.18 vs. 0.09±0.14 µg/kg/min, (p<0.001)], 48 h [0.12±0.18 vs. 0.06±0.17 µg/kg/min, (p<0.001)], 72 h [0.12±0.18 vs. 0.06±0.2 µg/kg/min, (p<0.001)]
(Table 3).
Throughout the study, all patients received ketamine infusions at a rate of 10 µg/kg/min. In our patient cohort, we examined an AE that might have been caused by ketamine. There were no documented side effects, and no patients suffered hypersalivation that required atropine therapy.
Delirium in the ICU is associated with diagnostic issues since the patient was unable to engage in the CAM-ICU evaluation. During their ICU stay, 15 (12%) individuals tested positive for delirium.
Discussion
In this trial, patients received significantly lower benzodiazepine, opiate, and vasopressor doses when ketamine was used as part of a multimodal sedation regimen, with no adverse effects. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first trial to demonstrate the benefits of low-dose ketamine infusion in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS patients.
It has been discovered that obtaining and maintaining enough analgesia before sedation reduces the duration of mechanical breathing, which is generally performed with the use of opioids. In our group of patients, ketamine exhibited an opioid-sparing effect. Our findings are consistent with previous research on low-dose ketamine (11-14). Ketamine is an agonist of the µ, d, and k-opioid receptors and an antagonist of the NMDA receptor, which might explain the reduction in opioid consumption (15,16).
According to our findings, ketamine infusion in mechanically ventilated patients reduced not only opioid consumption but also benzodiazepine use without compromising proper sedation. Although no studies have been undertaken to evaluate its effectiveness in describing extreme sedation, ketamine’s benzodiazepine-sparing effects are consistent with earlier work addressing moderate sedation techniques (17,18). This is crucial because long-term benzodiazepine infusions have been associated with delirium, long-term cognitive damage, and the need for additional MV time (19,20).
In addition to its positive respiratory dynamics profile, ketamine may have a chronotropic effect on the cardiovascular system via the sympathetic nervous system (15). We noticed a significant reduction in the demand for vasopressors in our patient group. This finding is consistent with a prior study on the use of low-dose ketamine in mechanically ventilated adult patients for moderate sedation (12).
Delirium is crucial in critically ill patients because it is related to diagnostic issues and therapeutic dilemmas, and each additional day of delirium is associated with a 10% increased risk of death (21,22). Dexmetatomidine appears to be producing positive results at the time; nevertheless, it is a more expensive chemical that can induce bradycardia, hypotension, hypertension, nausea, and atrial fibrillation (23,24). Furthermore, studies suggest that ketamine can be used for the treatment of delirium and depression because of its immune-regulatory effects on the peripheral and central nervous systems (25,26). Using the CAM-ICU, 15 patients (15%) tested positive for delirium throughout their ICU stay. This was substantially lower than predicted, given that the frequency of delirium in mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the ICU has been reported to be as high as 24.4% (23,24).
In recent studies, ketamine has been shown to have both proconvulsant and anticonvulsant effects (25). Convulsions were not detected in any of the participants taking ketamine in this trial. Furthermore, ketamine usage has been linked to hypersalivation, which is commonly treated with glycopyrrolate or atropine (26). None of the patients were given medication because of hypersalivation. Some studies highlighted possible adverse effects such as hypertension and tachyarrhythmias, which were not detected in any of the ketamine-treated patients. Lower ketamine doses (10 µg/kg/min) do not appear to produce the psychomimetic side effects observed at higher doses (12).
Study Limitations
The study was conducted at a single location and was retrospective, with no ability to manage treatments to impact analgesic and sedative requirements. However, prospective studies are required to verify these findings and determine the appropriate ketamine dosage in this circumstance.
Conclusion
This study shows that low-dose ketamine has a favorable safety profile, with no significant effects on hemodynamics or agitation. The initiation of ketamine infusion resulted in a significant reduction in the total fentanyl and midazolam requirements, indicating that ketamine as an analgosedative medication could be a viable alternative in mechanically ventilated patients.
Ethics Committee Approval: The study protocol was evaluated and approved by the University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital Ethics Committee (approval number: 2390, date: 29.05.2020).
Informed Consent: Retrospective study.
Authorship Contributions: Surgical and Medical Practices - S.B., M.H., A.N.S.; Concept - S.B., M.H., A.N.S., V.E, M.T.; Design - S.B., M.H., A.N.S., V.E, M.T.; Data Collection or Processing - S.B., M.H., A.N.S.; Analysis or Interpretation - S.B., M.H., V.E, M.T.; Literature Search - S.B., M.H.; Writing - S.B., M.H., A.N.S., V.E, M.T.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.
