Diurnal Variation of Fetomaternal Doppler and Fetal Cardiac Function Parameters in the Hospitalized Pregnancies: A Cross-Sectional Study
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Investigation
P: 116-120
May 2024

Diurnal Variation of Fetomaternal Doppler and Fetal Cardiac Function Parameters in the Hospitalized Pregnancies: A Cross-Sectional Study

İstanbul Med J 2024;25(2):116-120
1. University of Health Sciences Turkey, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Perinatology, İstanbul, Turkey
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 15.02.2024
Accepted Date: 25.04.2024
Publish Date: 24.05.2024
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Introduction:

To assess changes in blood flow in the uterine, fetal cerebral, and umbilical arteries (UA) by Doppler ultrasound and alterations in the variability of fetal heart rate (FHR) as well as fetal cardiac performance by fetal echocardiography between the 7.00 a.m. and 7.00 p.m. periods in pregnancies ranging from 24 to 39 weeks.

Methods:

Fifty pregnant participants underwent a customized fetal examination on the same day during both study periods, including Doppler measurements of the umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), fetal middle cerebral artery-pulsatility index (MCA-PI), middle cerebral artery-peak systolic velocity (MCA-PSV), cerebroplacental ratio, uterine artery-pulsatility index (UtA-PI), FHR, and fetal movements as well as various Doppler parameters of the fetal heart such as left isovolumetric contraction and relaxation times, mitral E- and A-wave velocities, the E/A ratio, K-index, filling time, and the myocardial performance index.

Results:

During the PM period, there was a meaningful increase in the MCA-PSV compared with the AM period. Conversely, the resistance in the MCA, particularly the PI, was found to be lower than that in the AM period. In addition, the FHR measured in the PM period increased compared with that in the AM period. The maternal UtA-PI and fetal UA-PI examined in the AM and PM periods were comparable. In addition, when all cardiac parameters examined in the study periods were compared, no significant difference was observed.

Conclusion:

The findings reveal that Doppler parameters observed during the study periods may change during the day and that the fetal cardiac function parameters, previously not assessed together, may not change during the day. Subsequent investigations can validate these observations using serial measurements of Doppler parameters in healthy and complicated gravidas.

Keywords: Circadian rhythm, Fetomaternal Doppler ultrasound, myocardial performance index

Introduction

Fetal Doppler ultrasound is crucial in prenatal medicine and obstetrics (1). It is used for screening, evaluating the health of the fetus, and monitoring pregnancies that are problematic. It has been demonstrated to have notable advantages in enhancing perinatal results and functioning as a tool to inform obstetrical decisions and decrease the requirement for neonatal intensive care (2).

Umbilical artery (UA) Doppler provides important information about fetal circulation. During healthy pregnancies, the fetoplacental unit expands as the pregnancy advances, ensuring sufficient oxygen and nutrition transport to support fetal growth (3,4). The umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI) serves as a critical tool for evaluating placental function, where increased resistance within the UA indicates placental impairment and associated with intrauterine growth restriction (5,6).

The middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler flow velocity measurement is useful in several clinical scenarios, including the assessment of fetal anemia, fetal hypoxia, and other conditions that might affect the fetal circulatory system. It offers data on how the fetus adapts to decreased oxygen levels. A lower level of middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI) indicates an adaptive decrease in vascular resistance to the fetal brain, which is usually referred to as the “brain-sparing effect” (7,8). The cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) was obtained by dividing the MCA-PI by the UA-PI. This ratio provides valuable information on both the condition of the placenta and the fetal response. It has been found to be a more accurate indicator of perinatal outcome than analyzing the MCA-PI and UA-PI separately (9-11). Peak systolic velocity (PSV) is a significant Doppler blood flow measurement in MCA that holds clinical importance. Fetal anemia increases MCA-PSV when the viscosity of blood decreases because of a decrease in the concentration of red blood cells (12).

The myocardial performance index (MPI), also commonly referred to as the Tei index, is an echocardiographic parameter used to assess fetal cardiac function. It was first described by Tei et al. (13) and is calculated as the total of isovolumetric contraction time (IVCT) and isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) divided by ejection time (ET). If there is an abnormality in the cardiac function of the fetus, it will result in a prolonged isovolumetric time and a shortened ET, leading to an increase in the MPI (14-16).

Circadian rhythms are physiological processes that adhere to an approximately 24 h pattern, regulate various physiological functions in our bodies, and are predetermined according to cyclic changes in the environment. The circadian rhythm of pregnancy is intricate; the mother, placenta, and fetus are separate circadian units that communicate with one another (17,18).

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SNS) is a biological clock that receives information from the environment and imposes a circadian pattern. The SNS develops very early in pregnancy. Therefore, the fetus has a circadian rhythm and receives circadian input from the mother (19). The fetus is invariably subjected to the maternal internal environment’s inherent rhythms, such as cortisol, heart rate, body temperature as well as the mother’s resting activity; rhythms generated by maternal melatonin crossing placenta unchanged and food intake (20).

The fetal examination needs to be performed at different times of the day according to patient and physician schedules. The various times of the day (morning, afternoon, evening) are not expected to have a major effect on the parameters evaluated, and fetal monitoring is independent of circadian rhythms (21). However, the authors described diurnal variations in several fetal physiological parameters, including heart rate, movements, and breathing (22,23).

There is little information on whether there is a diurnal variation in the parameters of fetal, placental, and maternal uterine blood flow. The objective of this investigation was to ascertain whether day-to-day variations in fetal, placental, and maternal Doppler parameters exist. We also saw if there was any change in intraday fetal cardiac performance, which has not been researched in any previous study.

Methods

This hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the Perinatology Center of University of Health Sciences Turkey, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, which is associated with the University of Health Sciences, in the Sultangazi community of İstanbul. The study was carried out after receiving consent from the University of Health Sciences Turkey, Haseki Training and Research Hospital Local Ethics Committee (approval number: 240-2023, date: 20.12.2023) in accordance with the relevant clinical ethics guidelines and the current Declaration of Helsinki. Before performing any procedures, each pregnant woman was given detailed explanations regarding the aim and nature of the procedures, and their informed written consent was obtained.

The study included women with 24-39 weeks of singleton pregnancies hospitalized for diagnostic purposes within the indication in our perinatology clinic and were not expected to give birth. The gestational age was ascertained with the use of first trimester ultrasonography. In addition, age, gravidity, parity, fasting glucose, and body mass index were recorded for all gravidas enrolled in the study.

The study conducted in 2023 had 78 gravidas, each holding a single fetus. Multiple pregnancies, employment of pharmaceutical drugs that potentially impact the fetoplacental and fetal circulatory systems, and fetuses exhibiting malformations and chromosomal anomalies were excluded. The gravidas that participated in the study were first examined by ultrasound at 7 a.m. while fasting, and the following parameters were collected: head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), femur length (FL), abdominal circumference (AC), estimated fetal weight (EFW), uterine artery-pulsatility index (UtA-PI), UA-PI, middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity (MCA-PSV), MCA-PI, CPR, fetal heart rate (FHR), and fetal movements (FM). She was then called back at 7 p.m. when she was full of rested, and the same parameters were checked by ultrasonography. They all ate the same type of food, adjusted to their diet, and served in the hospital at the same time.

All ultrasonography was performed by a single clinician (S.T.). The individual, unaware of subject allocation until the complete collection and analysis of data, conducted each session with a duration of 15 (±5) minutes. All sonographic studies were conducted, including color Doppler and pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Doppler assessments were performed without FM or respiration. In addition, the beam angle was maintained at 20°. UA Doppler tracings were taken on the free surface of the umbilical cord. MCA was sampled from the proximal section, close to its origin from the internal carotid artery (24).

To obtain the left MPI and other fetal cardiac parameters; initially, a 4-chamber perspective of the fetal heart was acquired, followed by a slight angled probe toward the apex to capture the aorta’s origin. The Doppler sample volume was opened to 3 mm and positioned on the ascending aorta’s lateral wall, situated beneath the aortic valve (AV) and just above the mitral valve (MV). The insonation angle was kept as close to 0° as possible and was always less than 30° (Figure 1). In addition, the E/A waveform consistently exhibited positive flow. However, the aortic blood flow waveforms were negative. The subsequent time intervals were estimated as follows: IVCT was estimated from the moment MV closed to AV opening, ET from AV opening to closure, and IVRT from AV closure to MV opening. MPI was determined by dividing the sum of IVCT and IVRT by ET.

Figure 1

Statistical Analysis

Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS v22.0 (USA). For descriptive statistics, the values of mean with standard deviation and median with range were used to present the numeric data. After Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to examine the normality of clinical and Doppler ultrasound parameters, the comparisons of study parameters were performed using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For categorical variables, the McNemar’s test was used. To determine significances, p-value of less than 0.05 was chosen.

Results

In 2023, a cohort of 78 gravidas with singleton gestations was enrolled in this study. However, only 50 gravidas could be included in the study. Of the remaining 28 subjects, they were excluded because of unsuitable fetal heart position or difficult assessment of the fetal heart.

The findings of 50 gravidas whose data could be fully collected during the study period were analyzed. In this study of 50 cases, 8 (16%) were normal healthy gravidas, 13 (26%) were gravidas with threatened preterm labor, 11 (22%) were gravidas with gestational diabetes (GDM), 8 (16%) were gravidas with fetal growth restriction, 5 (10%) were gravidas with anemia, and 5 (10%) were gravidas with type 2 diabetes.

Maternal and fetal characteristics are listed in Table 1. The mean values for the maternal age were 30.0±5.9 years. The median values for gravidity were 2 (1-11), parity was 1 (0-3), gestational age was 33 (24-39) weeks, BPD was 34 (25-38) weeks, HC was 33 (24-38) weeks, AC was 33 (23-41) weeks, FL was 33 (24-38) weeks, and EFW was 1950 (649-3210) g. The median values for body mass index were 27.4 (20.1-45.8) and fasting glucose was 76 (62-135) mg/dL. There were no abnormal findings related to amniotic fluid and placenta and except for 3 fetuses, all others were head presentation.

Table 1

Table 2 shows that the mean values for FHR was 135±7 beats/min in the AM period and 141±5.6 beats/min in the PM period. The mean FHR difference between the AM and PM periods was statistically significant (p=0.001). There was also a significant difference in the number of FM observed on ultrasound at 15 min between the AM and PM periods. The median MCA-PSV values were 41 (24-57) cm/s in the AM period and 51 (31-61) cm/s in the PM period. The mean difference in MCA-PSV between AM and PM was statistically significant (p=0.001) and the MCA-PI values measured in the PM period were significantly lower than the MCA-PI values measured at the AM period (1.4±0.19 vs. 1.6±0.2; p=0.001). The median values of CPR measured during the PM period. were significantly lower than those during the AM period [1.4 (0.4-3.6) vs. 1.5 (0.4-4.2); p=0.001]. Maternal UtA-PI and UA-PI were not statistically different between the AM and PM periods. The fetal cardiac parameters measured at the AM and PM periods are depicted in the Table 3. There were no significant differences in the Doppler parameters E, A, IVCT, IVRT, MPI, and filling time measured at the AM and PM periods (p>0.05).

Table 2
Table 3

Discussion

In our study, the MCA-PSV measured at 7 p.m. was significantly higher than that measured at 7 a.m., whereas the MCA-PI was significantly lower. As a result, CPR at 7 p.m. was significantly lower than that at 7 a.m. In addition, the FHR and movement in the afternoon were significantly higher than those in the morning. In our study, the UA-PI and mean UtA-PI in the morning and afternoon were not significantly different.

We found two studies that noted the effect of circadian rhythm on fetal and maternal Doppler. The first study, having a considerably similar design, had a wide range of gestational weeks and included both healthy and complicated gravidas like our participants. In this study, no significant change in the circadian rhythm was found in any of the Doppler parameters (25). In the other study involving healty pregnant women in their third trimester, the increase in MCA-PSV and decrease MCA-PI in the afternoon are smilar to our study (21). MPI and other cardiac parameters were not evaluated in either study.

In the current study, Doppler parameters at 7 a.m. were evaluated when the patient was fasting. The values at 7 p.m. were evaluated when the patient was full. Because the gravidas in the study were hospitalized, they all ate the same meals at the same time according to their diet. Opheim et al. (26) evaluated Doppler parameters before and after a meal. In this study, MCA-PSV evaluated when the pregnant woman was full was found to be high and MCA-PI was found to be low. In our study, the increase in PSV and decrease in PI of the MCA evaluated in the afternoon, when the pregnant woman was satiated, were similar to those found in this study (26).

The fetal Doppler waveform can be influenced by many factors (27). The factors involved are the angle of insonation and the region of measurement (28), technical factors like ultrasound settings, gestational age, FHR (29,30), fetal breathing (31,32) or hiccups, FM, and circadian rhythm (25). In our study, it is likely that technical factors did not significantly influence our study. Measurements were conducted using an identical instrument and by the same clinician. Measurements were obtained when fetal breathing and movement were not present.

In our study, FHR increased significantly in the afternoon, which may affect Doppler parameters. A limitation of our study is that we did not adjust the MCA Doppler parameters according to FHR. With the exception of a few studies (33), previous studies have ignored this. Another limitation of this study is the lack of neonatal outcomes and the relatively small number of cases. However, the number of cases was kept small because each patient was examined twice and the appropriate position for cardiac evaluation was waited. If the position was not favorable for fetal heart evaluation, the patient was given two more chances for a favorable position. If the fetal heart was not in the appropriate position, the patient was excluded.

When fetal cardiac parameters measured at 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. were compared, there were no significant differences. Studies on MPI, previously used to assess fetal cardiac function, have been shown that Oral Glucose Tolerance testing does not affect MPI (34), but some conditions such as fetal growth restriction (35), oligohydramnios (36) and maternal diabetes (tip 1, tip 2 and unregulated GDM) (37) increase MPI. In this study, we observed that circadian rhythm did not significantly affect fetal cardiac function. However, as this is the first study on this subject, further studies with a larger number of cases are needed.

This study demonstrated that circadian rhythms influence some Doppler parameters but not those related to cardiac function. Therefore, time of day should be taken into account when evaluating Doppler parameters. However, larger studies are necessary to develop a definitive nomogram for this purpose.

Conclusion

In conclusion, among the Doppler parameters examined in AM and PM in gravidas at 24 to 39 weeks of gestation, MCA-PSV was found to be significantly increased in PM, whereas MCA-PI was found to be significantly decreased. FHR was found to be increased in PM, contrary to other studies. As shown in previous studies, circadian rhythm affects Doppler parameters. However, more work is needed on this. However, fetal cardiac parameters did not change significantly in the AM and PM periods, and circadian rhythm did not affect fetal performance. As this is the first study on this topic, further studies are required.

Ethics Committee Approval: The study was carried out after receiving consent from the University of Health Sciences Turkey, Haseki Training and Research Hospital Local Ethics Committee (approval number: 240-2023, date: 20.12.2023) in accordance with the relevant clinical ethics guidelines and the current Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent: Informed written consent was obtained.

Authorship Contributions: Concept - A.Ö.; Design - A.Ö.; Data Collection or Processing - S.T.; Analysis or Interpretation - S.T., A.Ö.; Literature Search - S.T., A.Ö.; Writing - S.T., A.Ö.

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Erez O, Romero R, Jung E, Chaemsaithong P, Bosco M, Suksai M, et al. Preeclampsia and eclampsia: the conceptual evolution of a syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226: S786-803.
2
Faber R, Heling KS, Steiner H, Gembruch U. [Doppler Sonography during Pregnancy - DEGUM Quality Standards and Clinical Applications]. Ultraschall Med 2019; 40: 319-25.
3
Alfirevic Z, Stampalija T, Dowswell T. Fetal and umbilical Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 6: CD007529.
4
Byun YJ, Kim HS, Yang JI, Kim JH, Kim HY, Chang SJ. Umbilical artery Doppler study as a predictive marker of perinatal outcome in preterm small for gestational age infants. Yonsei Med J 2009; 50: 39-44.
5
Trudinger BJ, Giles WB, Cook CM, Bombardieri J, Collins L. Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and placental resistance: clinical significance. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985; 92: 23-30.
6
Arbeille P, Roncin A, Berson M, Patat F, Pourcelot L. Exploration of the fetal cerebral blood flow by duplex Doppler--linear array system in normal and pathological pregnancies. Ultrasound Med Biol 1987; 13: 329-37.
7
Chiba Y, Murakami M. [Cerebral blood flow dynamics in fetus]. No To Hattatsu 1992; 24: 136-9.
8
Wladimiroff JW, Tonge HM, Stewart PA. Doppler ultrasound assessment of cerebral blood flow in the human fetus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 471-5.
9
DeVore GR. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213: 5-15.
10
Flood K, Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, Kennelly MM, McAuliffe FM, et al. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 211: 288.
11
Khalil A, Morales-Rosello J, Khan N, Nath M, Agarwal P, Bhide A, et al. Is cerebroplacental ratio a marker of impaired fetal growth velocity and adverse pregnancy outcome? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216: 606.
12
Mari G, Deter RL, Carpenter RL, Rahman F, Zimmerman R, Moise KJ Jr, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis by Doppler ultrasonography of fetal anemia due to maternal red-cell alloimmunization. Collaborative Group for Doppler Assessment of the Blood Velocity in Anemic Fetuses. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 9-14.
13
Tei C, Dujardin KS, Hodge DO, Kyle RA, Tajik AJ, Seward JB. Doppler index combining systolic and diastolic myocardial performance: clinical value in cardiac amyloidosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 658-64.
14
Tsutsumi T, Ishii M, Eto G, Hota M, Kato H. Serial evaluation for myocardial performance in fetuses and neonates using a new Doppler index. Pediatr Int 1999; 41: 722-7.
15
Eidem BW, Edwards JM, Cetta F. Quantitative assessment of fetal ventricular function: establishing normal values of the myocardial performance index in the fetus. Echocardiography 2001; 18: 9-13.
16
Friedman D, Buyon J, Kim M, Glickstein JS. Fetal cardiac function assessed by Doppler myocardial performance index (Tei Index). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 33-6.
17
Seron-Ferre M, Valenzuela GJ, Torres-Farfan C. Circadian clocks during embryonic and fetal development. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today 2007; 81: 204-14.
18
Mark PJ, Crew RC, Wharfe MD, Waddell BJ. Rhythmic Three-Part Harmony: The Complex Interaction of Maternal, Placental and Fetal Circadian Systems. Journal of Biological Rhythms 2017; 32: 534-49.
19
Serón-Ferré M, Torres-Farfán C, Forcelledo ML, Valenzuela GJ. The development of circadian rhythms in the fetus and neonate. Semin Perinatol 2001; 25: 363-70.
20
Serón-Ferré M, Mendez N, Abarzua-Catalan L, Vilches N, Valenzuela F, Reynolds HE, et al. Circadian rhythms in the fetus. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2012; 349: 68-75.
21
Avitan T, Sanders A, Brain U, Rurak D, Oberlander TF, Lim K. Variations from morning to afternoon of middle cerebral and umbilical artery blood flow, and fetal heart rate variability, and fetal characteristics in the normally developing fetus. J Clin Ultrasound 2018; 46: 235-40.
22
Lunshof S, Boer K, Wolf H, van Hoffen G, Bayram N, Mirmiran M. Fetal and maternal diurnal rhythms during the third trimester of normal pregnancy: outcomes of computerized analysis of continuous twenty-four-hour fetal heart rate recordings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 247-54.
23
Visser GH, Goodman JD, Levine DH, Dawes GS. Diurnal and other cyclic variations in human fetal heart rate near term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 535-44.
24
Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Kiserud T. Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities and pulsatility index and the cerebroplacental pulsatility ratio: longitudinal reference ranges and terms for serial measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:287-96.
25
Staboulidou I, Wüstemann M, Schmidt P, Günter HH, Hillemanns P, Scharf A. Einfluss von zirkadianer rhythmik auf fetale und maternale Dopplerparameter--ist eine tageszeitliche veränderung nachweisbar? [Influence of circadian rhythm on fetal and maternal Doppler parameters--is a diurnal variation detectable?]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2008; 212: 47-52.
26
Opheim GL, Zucknick M, Henriksen T, Haugen G. A maternal meal affects clinical Doppler parameters in the fetal middle cerebral artery. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0209990.
27
Maulik D, Yarlagadda AP, Youngblood JP, Willoughby L. Components of variability of umbilical arterial Doppler velocimetry--a prospective analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1406-9.
28
Bhide A, Badade A, Khatal K. The effect of sampling site on the variability of Umbilical artery PI. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 235: 102-5.
29
Rühle W, Gnirs J, Schmidt W. Fetale Herzfrequenz und Doppler-Flow-Parameter in fetalen Gefässen--Auswertung von 2517 Einzelsignalen [Fetal heart rate and Doppler flow parameters in fetal blood vessels--evaluation of 2,517 individual signals]. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol 1993; 197: 90-4.
30
Yarlagadda P, Willoughby L, Maulik D. Effect of fetal heart rate on umbilical arterial Doppler indices. J Ultrasound Med 1989; 8: 215-8.
31
Chiba Y, Utsu M, Kanzaki T, Hasegawa T. Changes in venous flow and intra tracheal flow in fetal breathing movements. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985; 11: 43-9.
32
Mulders LG, Muijsers GJ, Jongsma HW, Nijhuis JG, Hein PR. The umbilical artery blood flow velocity waveform in relation to fetal breathing movements, fetal heart rate and fetal behavioural states in normal pregnancy at 37 to 39 weeks. Early Hum Dev 1986; 14: 283-93.
33
Zahid SM, Opheim GL, Henriksen T, Michelsen TM, Haugen G. Effect of a standardized maternal meal on fetal middle cerebral artery Doppler indices: A single-blinded crossover study. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0272062.
34
Ocal A. 75-G Oral Glucose Tolerance Testing Does Not Affect Fetal Cardiac Doppler Parameters in Low-Risk Pregnant Women. Medicine Science 2023; 12: 1082-7.
35
Zhang L, Han J, Zhang N, Li Z, Wang J, Xuan Y, et al. Assessment of fetal modified myocardial performance index in early-onset and late-onset fetal growth restriction. Echocardiography 2019; 36: 1159-64.
36
Madazlı R, Erenel H, Özel A, Öztunç F. Fetal left ventricular modified myocardial performance index and renal artery pulsatility index in pregnancies with isolated oligohydramnios before 37 weeks of gestation. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2021; 22: 286-92.
37
Özalp M, Demir O, Dinç G, Şal H, Aran T, Osmanağaoğlu MA, et al. Fetal cardiac Doppler changes in gestational diabetic pregnancies and its relationship with perinatal outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021; 47: 3480-7.
2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House